A couple of days ago, I had a really interesting discussion with Alma about the challenges of getting to know people in the academic classroom setting, when it’s the only place where you have contact.
I think a couple of the points from our discussion are applicable to the dating scene, especially to Bunni’s comment under the fourth post that it’s very difficult to get to know someone’s deeper qualities based on what they tell you on first or second dates.
Point #1: It’s much easier to figure out people’s strengths, weaknesses, tendencies, and credibility when you are able to observe them in any activity that requires demonstration of dependability, skills, knowledge, ability and interaction with others while under the pressure to perform.
For example, Alma got to know her sailing teammates (and to a lesser extent people on other teams) in a compressed period of time through direct observation and indirect corroboration by:
- Seeing who shows up on time prepared to work out, practice and race.
- Sailing with different people on a 2-person boat at practices and regattas.
- Hearing others comment on their current and past experiences sailing with each other.
- Hearing coaches comment on how individuals and pairs performed in a variety of situations, and give critique on how they can improve.
- Observing people’s behavior and communication during regattas, and when not racing.
- Seeing how people respond to wins and losses, and when receiving comments and critiques.
- On long trips to regattas, swapping stories about family and friends, and discussing/debating ideas or topics that come up.
- At social events, seeing what people’s friends are like, how they interact with others.
In summary, you can figure out whether a person is one you can rely on and learn from; with whom you can grow, have fun and spend most of your time; who will appreciate you for who you are and what you offer; and will build relationships with those you care about.
While this may take some wily planning on your part, before deciding whether to be exclusive with someone,
- learn from him/her the activity(ies) or field(s) which is a source of enjoyment and pride, and in which he/she is an active participant.
- Engage the help of someone from within your own circle who has expertise in (or deep knowledge of) that activity or field.
- Create an opportunity with sufficient time allowance for the expert to thoroughly assess your date, both when you’re present and when you’re not, to see how his/her behavior changes.
My husband’s favorite example, being a basketball player, is Michelle asking her basketball coach brother, Craig Robinson, to give Barack Obama the once over after they began dating. Read a version of it on Esquire. Even if you’re not looking for presidential material, having someone whose judgment you trust observe your date’s performance and reflect on the implications for his/her character is an invaluable way to get that reality check.
Don’t despair if your immediate circle is rather homogeneous — reach outside the circle. In my immediate circle, I can count on people who have deep knowledge of finances, basketball, medicine, music recording and performance, veterinary medicine, small car racing, cooking, art-making, and linguistics. If I reach outside of my immediate circle, I can also tap into the world of fundraising, poetry, triathlons, marketing, modern dancing, physics, investment banking, architecture, translation, fashion design, military history, to name a few.
Here’s the point: You don’t have to figure someone out on your own based on limited information — get a fuller picture of someone’s true character by observing him/her in active pursuit of an interest or passion before you commit. Sound reasonable?